Wednesday 6 July 2011

RACE 31 - GREEN BELTER KENT CHALLENGE - 2 July

Well getting my excuses in ridiculously early, I've got a cold. It started on Wednesday with a sore throat and progressed to what can only be discribed as a bit of a "snot~fest". However something more interesting happened on Wednesday.  I'd gone to the Decathlon store (two massive retail sheds of all things sporting and incidentally one of the sponsors of the Lakeside Tri ~ Race 28) at Surrey Quays to buy some more running socks as I seem to be getting through them at a fair old rate and also to kill some time before playing touch rugby at the nearby Southwark Park, when I bumped into the marshal who had been so helpful at The Bridge Triathlon last week. He remembered me and we got chatting as he was looking for a wetsuit and wanted some advice. Found out he was a black cab driver just going on shift and had just popped-in on the way to central London. Small world! 


This race has a similar (unsurprisingly) set up to Green Belter Hambleton (Race 24) in that you start with a short(ish) run, then hop on the mountain bikes, to be followed by another run which includes a break for some devilish obstacles and a kayak stage, before running back to the transition zone for a final obstacle of the inflatable.     

The race was taking part in Bedgebury Forest and Pinetum http://www.forestry.gov.uk/bedgebury which is down in the Weald (just on the boarders of Kent and Sussex) ~ loads of interesting stuff on the ecology, history and archaeology at the end. It was a late starting race (12:30) so a leisurely breakfast then time to go to the Post Office to pick up an Amazon parcel.  One of the books, 'On Tour' by Bradley Wiggins is a fascinating insight to the 2010 Tour de France, and I got quite distracted dipping into it (perfect timing really as the 2011 race has just started).  Tearing myself away, loaded the car with the bike (Scott Scale 50 if you're interested with Fulcrum wheels and oval chain rings) and all my bits and pieces.  Once out of London and past the M25, the countryside was beautiful, rolling hills, woodlands and heath, and some dramatic gradients ~ which pretty much describes the race location.

Arrived in good time to register and have a look at the racing kit in their onsite store.  As per usual some fantastic bargains ~ 50% Gore running clothing for instance, but as per usual, nothing I wanted in my size. So sourced something I could buy, a pre-race bacon sarnie and a cuppa! 

Following the race briefing, we were ready for the off.  I'd managed to get myself tucked in the middle of the starting crowd which was no good.  The first run was only 2km but you had to really sprint it as the majority of the 18km mountain bike stage was on single track so had very limited opportunities for overtaking and it could easily end up as a bit of a procession behind a slower rider. So it was a question of overtaking as many people as possible ~ often in the verges of the path which meant nettles and so on. Made up a fair amount of places though, I'm sure some runners were thinking that the pace was mad, but the aim was to get into transition in the top 20 or so. Some others had also done the race the previous year and knew the score as they were actually running in their SPD's (clip in MTB shoes) not wanting even to loose time in transition.  However all this effort didn't mean I couldn't enjoy the scenery including a dramatic single track section through a line of cypresses. 
Then onto the bikes to tear off down the hill to the Bedgebury car park where we had to log-out, go through the car park at a sedate pace before logging back in to hit the first single track.  During this period we weren't meant to overtake which to be fair nearly everyone adhered to.  However the lead cyclist was being ridiculously sedate obviously recovering from the run and made a few of those behind a bit frustrated especially as this particular slow-coach then led the first part of single track ~ still too slow for most of us! However we soon came to a forestry track and then it was all out sprinting to the next bit of single track.  
As the mountain biking element of the race is was on predominantly single track it means you can't relax for a minute or you're off. The courses are described on the Forestry Commission website as "designed for Mountain Bikers who enjoy all the challenges that this sport offers. But don’t be deceived by the beautiful and tranquil surrounding of this high quality Forestry Commission site, for the trails and cycling facilities are more than just a challenge for most riders – beginners or experts!  Over 13kms of dedicated single track trails wind their way through the forest in one continuous loop, which can be cut short to meet everyone’s needs. Each section offera wonderful riding experience from fast sweeping gradual descents that twist their way through the trees, to the sheer grunt and pain required to climb up ‘Cardiac Hill’ – tears to laughter and laughter to tears, as you cycle around this beautiful course." Which I guess pretty much sums it up. I found a group all going about the same speed and we had a great time. There was a real sense of camaraderie as if someone wanted to overtake they'd just call out and in a straightish bit you'll allow it and then give chase. If it had been wet it would have been really difficult with all the roots (which I'm not that good on) but even with all the recent rain it was predominantly dry and dusty, with a few muddy puddles to keep you on your toes. 


True to form, I was slightly slower downhill but a faster hill~climber. So at one of the forestry track interludes, this one going uphill I overtook everyone and hit the next single track section on my own. A momentary loss of concentration meant I went slightly wide (no more than a couple of inches) on one corner, clipped a stump with my peddle and came off. Needless to say, the group caught up, checked I was OK (found out at the end I'd gashed my leg and bruised my knee but racing you just don't notice it ~ the advantages of adrenaline), overtook and I was again at the back of the 'peloton'. Fortunately there was another opportunity and this time I didn't fall off! Feeling pretty good managed to overtake a couple more riders, uphill of course. Put some of the tips from the mountain biking "Skills for Thrills" DVD I'd watched last week into practice, still I'm needs quite a lot of finessing though, but I'm getting there. For instance, unlike road cycling, you don't lean into the bends on a MTB, you're meant to stay upright while leaning the bike and pushing down on the wheels to aid grip. It's kind of counter-intuitive and takes a bit of getting used to but it seems to work.


Then it was onto the second run.  It was during the race briefing the organisers had promised us that we would get wet, actually 'very wet, I hope you're not wearing anything you don't mind getting muddy and being able to swim would be useful'. It was down into the valley, and then promptly back out again. I was coming to a fork where a marshal was signalling for me to go right ~ up a narrow muddy path. This was being watched by a family obviously on a slightly less energetic tour of the beauties of the forest, when the small boy, he could only been 5 or 6, shouted 'hey mister all your friends went the other way!' Armed with this spontaneous piece of mis-information I followed the marshals instructions. I bumped into the family again later in the run and we had a bit of a laugh at the incident. The run route was a combination of forestry tracks, some single track cycle routes and some seemingly randomly taped routes over partially cleared forest. The hills were steep but doable, not the killer inclines of some of the cross country runs I have done / about to do. I think that is why I was feeling surprisingly relaxed, enough to actually start overtaking people! Then we went into the private estate area, where the character was much more open. We were also down in the bottom of the valley again, and you know what collects at the bottom of a valley? That's right water and in all probability in a lake format ~ so we were about to get wet!


A particularly pretty marshal ~ to digress, all the marshals had been really supportive and cheerful. It makes such a difference to the ambience of a race if they seem engaged in the event rather than talking to mates on mobiles etc. Anyway this particular marshal, with a huge smile warned me of a steep slope, but not to worry the first bit was 'mainly dry'. What she meant by 'mainly dry' was that it was ankle deep mud rather than out-and-out water. Don't you just love their sense of humour?


However I was encouraged by the relatively undisturbed nature of the mud that indicated that not too many people had gone through before me. Struggling along I turned a corner in the bank to find a small crowd waiting plus attendant race photographer, and some ominous looking tape going straight across the middle of the lake. So to cheers from the crowd, in I waded. It wasn't too cold, but it was a little 'uneven' underfoot with a couple of 'cheeky' chest deep holes.Oh well, at least I managed to cross without swimming. I did however notice while crossing that the waterlilies were spectacular, in full bloom of an almost iridescent white. It was the a wade around the far shore, about knee to waist deep, before scrambling out. 


Getting your legs moving again is a real effort after such a dunking. This wasn't helped by the next obstacle, a eight foot high slippery inclined wall (made out of scaffolding and plastic covered boards) that you were meant to run towards at full-pelt to get over.  That conquered, it was around the large lake to the kayak stage.  This is when a solo competitor can be at a disadvantage as only one of you is paddling rather than two.  However with a brief glance at the half dozen or so already on the lake, they all seemed to be 'billy-no-mates' ~ sorry solo's like myself. So into the rhythm and off round the lake ~ needless to say getting even wetter if that's possible. It was beautiful though and very relaxing, that is apart from the burning sensation of shoulders and arms. That done you had to be careful to time out with your chip before the 2km uphill (what else?) run to transition and the finish. I mention this as half way up I met I chap coming the other way who asked whether there had been a timing station at the kayaks. I explained where it was and off he sprinted to go and log out. Also I met a very disconsolate lad near the end walking who'd explained he'd missed logging out at the kayaks so wouldn't get a proper time and place. I suggested that he should just look out for my race number in the official results and he would have been in front ~ which cheered him up a bit. Well enough at any rate to start running again! 


Also near the top of the run the bike and run courses overlap. I met a couple just finishing their bike stage who where suitable impressed that I was finishing the run ~ which is a big lift. Chatting with them, well more gasping in my case, one thing that came across was how much they were enjoying themselves. This got me thinking a bit about why I enjoy these events, and my conclusion was reinforced the following day during the triathlon.


Then it was just the inflatable to conquer and finish! Feeling reasonably pleased with myself, it was off to the results tent to get a print-out of the time. Half a dozen of us were in front of the big screen waiting for the results to be posted. Another competitor joined us, looked at us all and then asked had we asked for the marshal to move the computer mouse as we were looking at the screensaver - duh!! Somewhat shamefaced, mouse duly moved the results came up.


Treating myself to a paella - stodgy but pretty tasty - just what was needed, I bought a couple of bottles of Redwood Creek wine from the sponsors marque (well it was on special offer and it almost seemed rude not to), dried off and packed the car for the pleasant (well up until London at any rate) drive home.


Swapped the bikes around, putting the TT bike in the car and started to pack my triathlon gear for the following day. Got the wetsuit out and packed before realising it was a pool swim triathlon, not open water, so wetsuit was not required. Read more of the Bradley Wiggins book for inspiration, resisted the temptation for a glass of recently purchased wine and off for an early night.   
  
RESULT: 14th out of 117 solo's in a time of 1:54:36 
(I manage to beat all 60 pair teams and all but one of the seven relay teams however if you factor in the two that missed the timing at the kayak stage probably a 16th is a fairer result?  However it all resulted in 'well-chuffed' sense of achievement)

BACKGROUND
THE PINETUM
(http://www.bedgeburypinetum.org.uk/index.php)

The Forestry Commission manages the National Pinetum for the nation. They aim to have a visually pleasing mix of conifers and broadleaved specimens contained in 350 acres of rolling Wealden countryside. The collection was started in the 1840's by the Beresford Hope family and was greatly improved following its acquisition by the Forestry Commission in 1925 when it became jointly managed with Kew Gardens. The planting scheme of William Dallimore, the first curator, largely kept all trees from the same genera together, whilst this was useful for comparing species it lead to an uninteresting landscape.

The 1987 storm destroyed up to a third of the trees, this sad event provided an opportunity to replant with mixture of trees to give a varied landscape. Now the aim is to provide a mix of 70% conifers to 30% broadleaves, and to leave 40% of the site open to provide vistas and allow the trees to be fully appreciated.


With its mixture of habitats Bedgebury is home to many birds and is an ideal place to see a wide variety of species. Goldcrests can be seen among the conifers and during winter afternoons hawfinches roost in the Pinetum. The visitor centre feeder attracts woodpeckers, siskins, marsh tits and nuthatches as well as the usual suspects.


The following animals have been found in the forest and Pinetum:-
Badgers, Brown Long-eared Bats, Daubenton's Bats, Noctule Bats, Pipistrelle Bats, Wild Boar, Fallow Deer, Roe Deer, Dormice, Foxes, Frogs, Hedgehogs, Common Lizards, Wood Mice, Mink, Moles, Newts, Rabbits, Shrews, Slow Worms, Grass Snakes, Grey Squirrels, Stoats, Toads, Voles, Weasels. We also have received unconfirmed reports of Adders

While the varied terrain and policy of keeping areas unmown encourage a wide variety of insects to thrive. It is especially known for Dragonfies and Damselflies with over 20 species being reported. The more usual butterflies sighted are Dark Green Fritilleries and White Admirals.

The policy of flail/collecting un-mown areas in autumn helps to impoverish the soil and inceases the diversity of flora. The Pinetum is home to four species of orchid and in spring is blessed with wide swathes of bluebells. 


THE FOREST (http://www.forestry.gov.uk/bedgebury)


The following is taken from the Bedgebury Forest archaeological survey. Bedgebury Forest is not a true ‘Forest’ in the medieval sense but a wooded area adjacent to Bedgebury Park. It includes the National Pinetum, the world’s finest collection of conifers. It is in the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and listed among the ‘Seven Wonders of the Weald’.


Geology & Soils: Bedgebury Forest is on a high plateau, with rolling hills forming domed ridges. The soil is poor and acidic, which is why woodland still remains here - better quality, more accessible, land was cleared for agriculture long ago. Clay iron-stone, the basis of the Wealden iron industry occurs as well as sandstones and clays; quarries and brickworks are evidence of use as local building materials. In the 1920s prospectors looked for oil and coal on the Estate.


Bedgebury is between the catchment of the rivers Medway and Rother. This is likely to have been an important topographical feature in the distant past. Streams in the Forest show evidence of dams, storing water for the iron industry and later ornamental lakes for Bedgebury Park.


Vegetation and Landuse: Bedgebury Forest and Pinetum have always been wooded so are classified as ancient woodland sites. Heather is found and this, combined with documentary evidence, suggests part may have been managed as wooded heath. Since the Forestry Commission brought the site in 1924 many of the native trees have been replaced by conifers or sweet chestnut over much of the area. Commercial forestry management, which continued until the 1990s, was supported by tree nurseries and sawmills within the forest; the focus is now on recreation, marketed as ‘Adventure in a world of trees at Bedgebury’. Facilities include walking, cycling, mountain biking, horse riding and orienteering based around a Visitor Centre. The theme of the play area is Victorian plant-hunters creating a link to the world renowned Pinetum collection.


The development of the recreational facilities have been carefully planned to take into account conservation issues and minimise disruption to Bedgebury’s abundant wildlife and special habitats.  The change in management focus from timber production to public recreation presents an ideal opportunity to make large numbers of people more aware of the archaeological aspect of their cultural heritage.


Prehistoric and Roman Evidence – contrary to previous thought prehistoric communities did not avoid the Weald because of its dense woodland; the important food and mineral resources were utilised from earliest times. It is possible that a prehistoric ironway crosses the area; a Roman road runs nearby at Cranbrook, where there is a Roman bloomery.


Pre-Domesday - Various Anglo-Saxon Charters refer to swine pastures in the Weald and the area is crossed by droveroads and trackways – many persisting today. During the early medieval or Jutish period agricultural holdings extended from their hubs west into the Weald, over previously wooded common land; documentary evidence links Bedgebury with Wye, a royal manor prior to 1066, Hollingbourne, Faversham and Sturry, all in East Kent. Hartley (field of young stags) was mentioned in AD 803 as at the end of a drovers road from the manor of Wye .


The first specific mention of Bedgebury is an Anglo-Saxon Charter of AD 841 and the name derives from the OE ‘bycge’ and the OK ‘vecge’ meaning to bend or turn, possibly referring to the stream(s). By the time of Domesday, the ‘dens’, still persisting in place names indicating settlements in wooded surroundings, were well established.


Medieval Bedgebury - Families often took their names from where they lived and the archives list John de Bedgebury as the earliest resident in the time of Edward II [1307-1326]. Members of this family are buried in Goudhurst Church and are linked by marriage to the Colepepers, alos known as the Culpeppers, who were resident until at the time of the restoration of Charles II, and rebuilt the mansion – the site of the original is thought to be under the lake - and created the park. The estate later passed into the Stephenson family who retained it until it was left to a Miss Peach who quickly sold it to John Cartier, Governor of Bengal and Sheriff of Kent, in 1788-9.  Henry VIII, Elizabeth I and Thomas Cromwell all visited Bedgebury.


Iron working - Bedgebury lies in the heart of the Kent iron producing area. The Bakers of Sissinghurst and the Culpeppers were landowners who set up iron works, where raw iron stone was smelted with charcoal to produce the pig iron, and then turned into iron products, mostly munitions. These processes required a plentiful supply of water, wood and charcoal. The Wealden Iron Research Group has amassed considerable evidence and details about the industry, the location of forges and furnaces and the products.


William Camden describes the sight of the Weald iron works in Brittannia, 1526, as -:
"It is full of iron-mines for the casting of which there are furnaces up and down the country, and abundance of wood is yearly spent; many streams are drawn into one channel, and a great deal of meadow ground is turned into ponds and pools for the driving of mills by the flashes which, with the beating with hammers upon iron, fill the neighbourhood round about, night and day, with continued noise. The proprietors of the mines, by casting cannon and other things, make them turn to good account. But whether the nation is in any way advantaged by them is a doubt which the next age will be better able to resolve" .


The iron industry had a significant effect on the woodland as much was coppiced and processed into charcoal. Direct evidence of this remains throughout Bedgebury in the form of charcoal heaths. In the early 1600s the people of Cranbrook made a formal complaint about the consumption of wood, destined for the casting of guns. Pond bays and penstocks (or reservoirs) are also visible remainders of the iron industry as are the names Furnace Farm and Forge Farm. Lake Lousia, now part of Bedgebury Park was probably one of the penstocks for Frith Furnace.


Farming - Bedgebury is surrounded by a number of old farmsteads. Some were former manors and others were part of the Bedgebury Estate. The current project has uncovered rental and tenancy agreements and sale particulars which record owners and when these were acquired by the estate, particularly in the 19th century. Likewise changes in ownership of Bedgebury itself have been traced. At one time the estate included 30 farms.


Route-ways - Bedgebury Forest lies at the end of several Jutish lathes and manorial den systems belonging to manors in north and north east Kent. Routeways into this part of the Weald were well established by the early medieval period, probably developed from Jutish droveways that followed former Roman and prehistoric routes used for exporting iron products. Some researchers consider that a prehistoric ironway runs through the southern part of Bedgebury.


A network of lanes surrounds Bedgebury. Some, for example Bishop’s Lane, running east from Forge Farm towards Furnace Farm; were explored as part of this project. It was partly obscured by the disused railway line but can be traced on from Furnace Farm to Hartley as a bridleway. This route may have been used by the iron producers at Furnace Farm as a means of transporting their iron goods out to Cranbrook and on out of the Weald. Soper’s Lane, Siseley, formed part of the boundary perambulation of the den linking Highgate in Hawkhurst to Frith Farm.


Many lanes and tracks around Bedgebury are hollow ways, created by the passage of feet, hooves and water erosion over centuries of use. This project focused particularly on a complex linear feature running west to east through the forest along the ridge of high ground which divides the water catchments. Another linear earthwork branches from this route, running north towards Furnace Farm and two further branches lead west out of the Forest across Starvegoose Bank. .


The Railway Line: A railway line was proposed by Beresford-Hope in 1869 to link Paddock Wood and Cranbrook, where a station was opened in 1892. A short extension was added to Hawkhurst, with the station at Gills Green. The railway partly followed ‘Bishop’s Lane’ an ancient routeway. The railway provided a life line for getting timber and agricultural products out of this part of the Weald; a 1955 photo of Hawkhurst station shows huge numbers of hop poles stacked awaiting dispatch. During the First and Second World Wars timber harvested and processed by the four saw-mills on the Estate for the war effort was distributed by rail from sidings within the estate. The line closed in 1961, part of the Beeching cuts.


Bedgebury Park and Pinetum - In 1836 Viscount Lord Beresford enclosed the red brick house with local sandstone, probably from Priors Heath Quarry and extended it. He ‘improved’ the estate between 1840 and 1848 by creating the village of Kilndown and three lodges. One of these, Keepers Lodge, now known as Park House, is in the centre of the Pinetum. The ornamental Park developed from the late 17th century. We know that from 1850 the estate staff increased – to 40 gardeners at the peak – housed at Kilndown and Bedgebury hamlet.


The Pinetum - In the mid 18th century plant collecting was all the rage with private landowners vying with each other to include rarities in their collections. Marshal Viscount Beresford initiated the pinetum in the 1850s and his successor, his stepson Alexander James Beresford-Hope, developed Lady Mildred’s Drive to enable visitors in carriages to view the trees. Named for his wife this currently runs from Marshall’s Lake through the Pinetum and originally continued on to Bedgebury Lodge. It was marked by Lawson’s cypress trees, some of which can still be seen.


The estate was sold in 1899 to Isaac Lewis who allowed the collection to fall into neglect, and it was purchased by the Crown Estate in 1918. The Royal Botanic Gardens at Kew and the Forestry Commission established The National Pinetum as a joint venture in 1924 as air pollution was rendering London unsuitable for growing conifers and there were already some fine, mature specimens there. A site at the southern end of Bedgebury Park was chosen, centred on Marshall’s Lake and occupying a stream filled valley; Forest Plots were laid out close to the former pheasantry at Birchen Toll.


The Second World War saw action at Bedgebury, for in 1940 six bombs and one incendiary bomb fell on the Forest. In 1942 there was a disastrous forest fire when more than 360 acres of Bedgebury Forest was destroyed. Throughout the 1950s and 1960s visitor numbers grew which lead to the creation of a car park in the old walled fruit garden belonging to Bedgebury Home Farm. In 1977 the Pinetum was extended southwards and two new lakes were created. In 1987 a quarter of the standing trees in the Pinetum were brought down in the ‘Great Storm’. In 2006 the car park was moved further up Park Lane, adjacent to the new visitor centre serving both the Pinetum and Bedgebury Forest with extended visitor and recreational facilities.


C20th History - The Crown Estate Commissions purchased the Estate, which consisted of 2326 acres from Isaac Lewis between 1918 and 1919. Much of the timber, valued at £80,000, was Scot’s Pine, with other stands of conifers and chestnut coppice being the principle species. It was transferred to the Forestry Commission in 1924 and the mansion house and park were passed to the Church Education Corporation, the forerunner of Bedgebury School.


THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL FEATURES


The multi-banked and ditched linear feature -This is almost continuous through the Forest from the south west corner at Windy Ridge, Flimwell, to Louisa Lodge. Parts could not be followed because of dense vegetation and here parts may been removed by forestry operations. The earthwork re-appears along Park Lane before finally disappearing near Duke’s Wood. At the Windy Ridge end a branch joins near the Saw mill site with another heading due north past the site of the brick works and on towards Furnace Farm. Aerial photos and early maps suggest there maybe another two branches leading north and south from Hedginford Wood.


At first glance this earthwork, which is over 60m wide in places with up to half a dozen banks and ditches of varying sizes, could be interpreted simply as a routeway following the ridge of high ground that divides the catchments of the River Rother and that of the Rivers Beult and Medway. This is probably too simple. It seems likely it was originally a route linking the iron producing areas of the Weald to communities in the North Downs and North Kent Coast in pre-Roman times. It came to mark the division between two large wealden commons, which became broken up into the ‘dens’ or swine pastures; the earthwork marks the division between the dens of Wye and the dens of Hollingbourne. In the post-medieval period it was still a significant boundary marking the division between two landowners. Bedgebury Estate had its heyday in the 16th century with the creation of a ‘New Park’; it is possible that the boundary of this partly followed the earthwork. It is not clear when it stopped functioning as a routeway but it is not shown as such on maps and documents in the late 18th century.


The Forest is criss-crossed by earthworks of various kinds and size – banks, ditches, and lynchets. More research is required to record these but the profile of those studied suggests they may be the remains of former field systems. We have no clue as to when these were enclosed or when they fell out of use.


Saw pits and Charcoal Hearths - Given that Bedgebury Forest is in the Wealden Iron producing area, it was not surprising that charcoal hearths can be seen. All but one of those recorded was circular, up to 10m across, on slight slopes and near water. One was rectangular; perhaps a later hearth taking several ‘clamps’ to produce charcoal for the house rather than the iron industry.


Saw pits are often found near charcoal hearths. With only horse and man power it would have been very difficult to move whole tree trunks so they were processed into sawn timber directly where they fell.


Modern drainage networks - Digging drains ahead of coniferisation was standard practice in the past. Several ditch systems can be seen on the 1946 aerial photos, examples of ‘modern archaeology’.


Pond bays - One of the limiting factors in iron production was need for water to power the furnace bellows and the hammers in the forges. Wealden streams are notorious for being raging torrents in winter fading to trickles in summer, so holding water in reservoirs or penstocks was vital. Pond bays were identified within Bedgebury, north of Iron Latch and at Starvegoose Bank, in addition to the previously recorded ‘hammer ponds’ at Frith and Furnace farms and Louisa Lake.


Quarries and brickworks - Clay pits for brick making were easily recognised as they are close kilns and drying sheds. But for other areas of quarrying, for example Hedginford, it is not clear what was being extracted. Nor is it not clear whether iron stone for the furnaces was dug in Bedgebury Forest or brought in from outside.

No comments:

Post a Comment